Why would it have been so outlandish to simply send the bailout/stimulus cash to the people of the US?

Answers:9   |   LastUpdateAt:2012-11-05 07:31:02  

Asked at 2012-08-16 23:46:04
Cash could have been a bit irresponsible , but we could achieved 5000-6000 (about one billion dollars) a piece of that money would be spent on

1.Rent/Mortgage vouchers .
2 . Debt / credit vouchers.
3 . Home owner bailouts
4 . Billions of aid refunds university position

In this way the money would trickle down to corporations anyway and people would have a huge load of pressure off of them - and the government would get a lot of new taxes in
Auto industry - would be in better shape after people pay back arrears
car loan
Real estate - get huge amounts of mortgage payments back

Tenants -
receive huge amounts of back rent
Colleges - billions in unpaid loans payments university

and industry begins to move slowly because many would not survive to pay the bills

Then again that makes sense and obviously do not believe that DC . We will give bankers and finance throw our 'friends' projects will not begin for 2-3 years. Nice people, very nice.
Answer1lijanAnswered at 2012-08-17 03:11:04
With all that money there , inflation will eat it.
Answer2IgnatiusAnswered at 2012-08-18 04:28:03
How about replacing Social Security with a check monthly benefit available to all U.S. citizens over the age of 18 and not in jail. This benefit would replace social security , welfare, unemployment benefits , supplemental social rent , student loans , etc. .

Think of a plan sponsored by the government and the coup. Been removed .

The baby boomers of today can opt out of future social security benefits in exchange for this benefit start now . Instead of paying the amount of the estimated benefits will begin laying down in a few years , they could accept a smaller amount at this time.
While other programs could replace the amount of their benefits .

This benefit is not taxable under $ 100,000 a year . Banks and financial institutions could be sure that the money would be there, in a sense guaranteed by the government to pay their loans. With so much uncertainty that wants to get a loan? Who wants a loan?
It would not be cost savings and other benefits to this plan. Crime rates fell by people who do not want to lose their advantage by breaking the law and going to jail.

Otherwise the only alternative seems to be trying to pump the market stearoids backup . It created the Federal Reserve Bank to deal with a financial meltdown , now you just created a mini - me, a clone version of the Fed bank to do exactly what the Fed did during the last crash , provide liquidity . Everything is based on a farce. We need real reform.
Answer3chongAnswered at 2012-08-19 14:02:03
Because it makes no sense to send it back to the people who come . MedlinePlus The poor and middle class pay taxes that are distributed to the rich ... otherwise it is called "communism " to refer to countries we do not like and "socialism " when we refer to our communist allies .
Answer4need a serious and urgent help with thisAnswered at 2012-08-22 04:27:02
Stimulating the economy is more complex than giving money ...
Answer5kailaAnswered at 2012-08-27 12:00:03
Because, simply , not about us. They do not care . This is what they can do for themselves and to ensure they stay in power.
Answer6AundreaAnswered at 2012-08-29 11:54:14
Answer7Mark MainAnswered at 2012-09-03 00:02:02
You have to understand , it is time to return the organizations that helped Obama in the White House . The economy is just an excuse to get the money out there.
Answer8GeniaAnswered at 2012-09-05 05:13:06
Friend of the parasites in power could have sent each taxpayer $ 100,000 and that would have cost much less ! cries , the problem is that you loose control voters.in your opinion is too stupid to spend your dollars.think fkng tax itself ! is the truth , vote smart in the next election .
Answer9LyndseAnswered at 2012-09-08 14:52:02
Simple increasing its independence and reduce the influence the government has over you .
Answer10rajshekharAnswered at 2012-11-05 07:30:39
Some of it might have gone to contributing members of society. Can't have that.
Related Questions
  • Answer This Question:Why would it have been so outlandish to simply send the bailout/stimulus cash to the people of the US?