Why don't we stop playing political roulette and simply charge a consumption tax.?

Answers:1   |   LastUpdateAt:2012-10-23 16:16:03  

Asked at
Instead of charging anyone who already pays significant amounts of tax, rather, why not let those who do not know how to pay their share, to find a way that can help this country to survive. There are thousands of people who can not legally seek employment. Others do not know, or could not find a job that allows them to pay income taxes. These people are self-employed or just do what they have found that will allow them to make money. They are surviving the best way they know how to survive, but despite using the tax services provided, not know how to contribute to the funds that allow these services available. MedlinePlus If everyone pays only a consumption tax, everyone helps with the cost of continuing with the American lifestyle. We care for those who need help, here at home and abroad. We want to help the poor, but we want to encourage those saving and people doing work to keep doing it. I hear that less than half of us pay all taxes. No wonder that all plans to raise taxes or cut services, met with outrage. We all agree that the waste should be a priority on the list of things to cut, but the next thing on the list should be to allow those who are not paying their contributions. Many despise the poor, but know the fundraisers ... I want someone who has the time would give the American people the statistics indicating what percentage of people in each income level will help those in need. The poor give to worthy causes at a rate much higher than the rest of the people in the world. The middle class people in the U.S. get most of the money to needy causes lift, and yes, there are rich people who give huge amounts of help when you need to see here in America. Not that we want to, we have given. MedlinePlus Taxing the rich sounds good, but the rich know how to find the way to pass the cost of taxes to others. The middle class is struggling, and the poor ... and pray for them. However, if everyone pays their fair share, we are paying us probably pay less and still get our budget balanced in a few years instead of allowing this great nation is weakened and struggling to survive. If everyone pays, including those involved in illegal activities, which according to report their income, the rich and everyone else, everyone pays an amount equal to the amount consumed. The rich could not hide behind your business, since all consumption and imports would be taxed. If the rich choose to save rather than spend, this could be a patriotic thing too, because if the rich put their money in banks, financial institutions, would have more money available for loans to small businesses and families. This would stimulate the economy without putting more burdens on already burdened or support our lifestyle. MedlinePlus Mr. Chairman, how much money would we save if ended with the IRS? We suddenly have to dismiss all of them, but could use their intellectual skills to assess the level of consumption of the citizens, and impose a tax on goods and services consumed by individuals in each income level. Needs can be taxed at an exceptionally low level, and luxury goods can be taxed at levels required to bring the revenue needed to balance our budget over time. The consumption tax could be taken as sales taxes are collected. PD (IRS workers would this period of time, perhaps a year, to seek employment in other areas.) MedlinePlus I feel this plan would be the best solution to the financial problems of this country.
Answer1AnnalisaAnswered at 2012-10-23 16:14:32
The VAT , which is effectively a tax on consumption , has worked very well here in Australia . You need to keep the tax simple , however , and any taxes at the same rate , and avoid exclusions. MedlinePlus MedlinePlus You still need income taxes as well , but can get down and simplify .
Related Questions
  • Answer This Question:Why don't we stop playing political roulette and simply charge a consumption tax.?